Kansas Pro-Abortion Forces Persecution of Phill Kline Beginning to Backfire

Testimony by Judges, lawyers, and other witnesses are rolling up evidence of malpractice by those charging former Kansas Attorney Phill Kline of ethics violations while he was attorney general and district attorney of Johnson County, Kansas.

It is being verified by witnesses that the evidence of Abortion clinics failing to report statutory rape has been covered up by pro-abortion officials trying Kline for ethics violations.

Kansas Travesty: 249 child-age abortions over 3 years, just four sex abuse reports: Kline Hearings

by Peter Jesserer Smith
Thu Feb 24, 2011 13:20 EST

TOPEKA, Kansas, February 24, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Evidence entered into the Phill Kline ethics trial Wednesday revealed that state agencies had received reports of 249 abortions on children under the age of 15 years old between 2001-2003, but that abortion providers, who are mandatory reporters, had sent in only four reports of child sexual abuse.

Tom Williams, Kline’s chief investigator when he was attorney general (and later district attorney), said that he made the discovery in 2003 during a broader effort meant to tackle underreporting of child sexual abuse in the state.

Williams testified to a sworn affidavit, entered into evidence Tuesday, that abortion records from the Kansas Department of Health and Education (KDHE) showed an aggregate 249 “termination of pregnancy” reports on females under 15 years for 2001, 2002, and into 2003. Abortion providers are required by law to send reports to KDHE with statistical information surrounding the abortion (which does not include specific patient information.) Read story here at LifeSiteNews.

When the hearing is finished and Kline is vindicated, those lying to the hearing and in past hearings, i.e., courts, lawyers, etc., should be charged, brought to trial, and sent to prison for their hindering a legal investigation against George Tiller and Planned Parenthood.

Kansas pays more than $500,000 to defend former AG Kline, aides in ethics case

Another post on the persecution of Phill Kline, former Kansas Attorney General of Kansas and County Attorney of Johnson County, for going after George Tiller and Planned Parenthood.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First Posted: April 17, 2011 - 3:34 pm
Last Updated: April 17, 2011 - 5:03 pm

TOPEKA, Kan. — Kansas taxpayers have picked up the tab forhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif more than $500,000 in legal fees and expenses for former Attorney General Phill Kline and two of his aides, and with more hearings upcoming this summer, that bill is likely to go even higher.

Kline is accused of violating the state's ethics code as an attorney while he was attorney general and Johnson County district attorney. The allegations stem from investigations Kline conducted into the Planned Parenthood clinic in Overland Park and George Tiller's abortion clinic in Wichita. Read article in Daily Journal here.

As I taxpayer, I ask, where is the problem? It was corrupt Kansas Politicians in the governor's office, the attorney general's, and the Kansas Supreme Court that continues to go after Kline in "punishment" for "daring" to go after Planned Parenthood, the "darling" of Kansas Democrats. I have kept a time log of this case from the time Kline was Kansas Attorney General until now. The contributions of the pre-born baby exterminators that put these corrupt politicians into office to protect Planned Parenthood and the then Dr. Tiller.

Tiller's donations to former pro-abortion governor Kathleen Sebelius totaled $200,000 to defeat pro-life candidate Shallenberger:

A Kansas pro-life organization re-released a letter Wednesday in which late-term Wichita abortionist Dr. George Tiller admitted to personally donating $200,000 to his political action committee, ProKanDo, to support Kathleen Sebelius in her 2002 gubernatorial campaign against pro-life Republican challenger Tim Shallenburger.Source.

Sebelius' dishonesty became apparent to the senate who was in the process of confirming Sebelius at Obama's Health Secretary.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health secretary nominee, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, got nearly three times as much political money from an abortion doctor as she told senators. Read source here:

The pro-abortion cabal, supported by their bought and paid for public servants, hoped to bankrupt Kline, but now that seems like a moot point. However, they still want to take away his law license, and intimidate any future public servant that would dare raise their legal objections to Planned Parenthood. And it seems that the Capitol-Journal, and other print media are eager to support the pro-abortion corruption.

This is what it is in a nutshell. I will continue to follow this story.

Pro-lifer: Blacks 'exterminating' themselves

Russ Jones
OneNewsNow
4/14/2011 4:30:00 AM

A pro-life advocate in Kansas is battling to fight the growing epidemic of abortion among blacks.

Reports indicate abortion is the leading cause of death within the African-American community in the U.S. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), since 1973 -- the year of the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade -- 13 million African-American lives have been lost to abortion.

Peggy Elliott Ministries was honored with a $2,500 grant at the recent Servant Awards celebration in Wichita, Kansas. Dr. Peggy Elliott, ministry founder and president, says it is time for the genocide to stop. Read entire article here.

The Democrat's Big Lie: Claiming They Have Always Been for Civil Rights for the Blacks

Part 2--In 1870, The Fifteenth Amendment to the constitution, the Voting Rights Amendment was Ratified, Allowing Blacks to Vote in All Parts of the US

After the War Between the States, legislation provided for voting rights for blacks, but the acts did not pertain to the North and border states.

At the time of Ulysses S. Grant's election to the presidency in 1868, Americans were struggling to reconstruct a nation torn apart by war. Voting rights for freed blacks proved a big problem. Reconstruction Acts passed after the war called for black suffrage in the Southern states, but many felt the approach unfair. The Acts did not apply to the North. And in 1868, 11 of the 21 Northern states did not allow blacks to vote in elections. Most of the border states, where one-sixth of the nation's black population resided, also refused to allow blacks to vote. Pbs-American Experience.

Who originated the plan to resolve this issue? It was the Republicans in congress. After a lot of wrangling, the Fifteenth Amendment was passed by congress on February 26, 1869. The amendment was ratified by 17 Republican states, and rejected by 4 Democrat states in the South. However, congress had one trick up their sleeve. The Southern States had not yet been re-admitted to the union, and in order to be admitted, they had to ratify the amendment, which they eventually did by 1870.

However, as we see in my last post of April 6, The Southern Democrats formed the KKK to defeat the intent of the amendment, and did everything they could, legal or illegal, to deprive the newest citizens of the country to exercise their right to vote.

The Tuskegee Institute has recorded 3,446 lynchings of blacks and 1,297 lynchings of whites between 1882 and 1968.[1] Southern states created new constitutions between 1890 and 1908, with provisions that effectively disenfranchised most blacks, as well as many poor whites. People who were not permitted to vote were also not permitted to serve on juries, further excluding them from the political process.

African Americans mounted resistance to lynchings in numerous ways. Intellectuals and journalists encouraged public education, actively protesting and lobbying against lynch mob violence and government complicity in that violence. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), as well as numerous other organizations, organized support from white and black Americans alike. African-American women's clubs, such as the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching, raised funds to support the work of public campaigns, including anti-lynching plays. Their petition drives, letter campaigns, meetings and demonstrations helped to highlight the issues and combat lynching.[2] In the Great Migration, extending in two waves from 1910 to 1970, 6.5 million African Americans left the South, primarily for northern and mid-western cities. Wikipedia.

Democrats Big Lie: Democrats always about Civil Rights for Blacks; Republicans always against.

I am sick and tired of the Big Lie of the Democrat Party, that they were behind civil rights and that they always have been. They also picture the Republican Party as always having been against civil rights. That is a deliberate lie! But what is the Truth?

The truth is as I stated in the previous paragraph. The Democrats have always been against the civil rights of the black man. In this and following articles, I will prove that by providing a time line that supports my contention.

I could go back farther than President Lincoln’s time, but I may do so later. To begin with, in April 16, 1862, President Lincoln signs a bill abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia. The vote in Congress is very interesting. The record shows 99% of Republicans voted yes; but 83% of the Democrats vote no.

In the following Democrat website, we find the following words:

“Democrats have a long and proud history of defending Civil Rights and expanding opportunity for all Americans.” Apparently in 1862, they had not yet gotten the word. Democrats.org.

The Thirteenth Amendment was added to the Constitution in 1865. It made slavery illegal in the United States. In 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, designed to protect citizen’s rights to freedmen, was ratified. This amendment became the heart of the civil right’s movement of the 1960s. It became an all-in-all for everyone and everybody’s assumed civil rights. Democrats jump on the amendment claiming it provides the right of everyone to do and to be everything the constitution does not provide for.

Southern Democrats not satisfied with the outcome of the War Between the States, create an organization to “punish” Republicans for freeing the slaves: The Klan is Created
The Ku Klux Klan started after the Civil War with a group of white Southerners who were very angry when the war ended. They were angry because the Blacks had won their freedom from slavery and they had lost their slaves. No more slavery meant their lives had changed and they felt threatened.

The boredom of a small-town life made six young Confederate veterans from the south gather around a fireplace one night, where they thought of a secret group. They made the group to occupy themselves and to get revenge on the mhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifany Blacks that had won their freedom in the Civil War. The group wanted to torture former slaves, because the slaves had won their freedom. The Klan members felt threatened because they thought the Blacks would start to get more powerful. In addition, many Klan members were angry because they lost their slaves. thinkquest.org

The original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white, according to a new television program and book, which describe how the Democrats started the KKK and for decades harassed the GOP with lynchings and threats.

An estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites died at the end of KKK ropes from 1882 to 1964.

The documentation has been assembled by David Barton of Wallbuilders and published in his book "Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White," which reveals that not only did the Democrats work hand-in-glove with the Ku Klux Klan for generations, they started the KKK and endorsed its mayhem. KKK's 1st targets were Republicans.

The Democratic Party was formed in 1792, when supporters of Thomas Jefferson began using the name Republicans, or Jeffersonian Republicans, to emphasize its anti-aristocratic policies. The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow.

The Democratic Party identified itself as the "white man's party" and demonized the Republican Party as being "Negro dominated," even though whites were in control. Determined to re-capture the South, Southern Democrats "redeemed" state after state -- sometimes peacefully, other times by fraud and violence. By 1877, when Reconstruction was officially over, the Democratic Party controlled every Southern state. The South remained a one-party region until the Civil Rights movement began in the 1960s. Northern Democrats, most of whom had prejudicial attitudes towards blacks, offered no challenge to the discriminatory policies of the Southern Democrats. Ibid.